🔗 Share this article

Loved ones whose relatives buried in graves at risk from coastal erosion state that indecision on how best to tackle the issue is creating unnecessary distress about the eternal homes of their loved ones.

A Looming Threat to Historic Graveyards

The council have singled out three burial grounds in the communities of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being at risk of being consumed by the ocean in the coming decades.

A recent report on the situation sets out a series of options, from doing nothing to disinterring bodies and reburying them in safer locations. Authorities maintain it is for local people to decide how to proceed.

“At the moment we’re in limbo. It causes me distress. My parents intended this to be their final resting place, but it isn’t going to be because of the sea.”

Projections suggest at least part of one churchyard could fall into the waves in the next 80 years, but some locals fear it will happen much sooner. “In my view it’s got less than 20 years, if you look at what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” one said.

Troubled by the Ghosts of Eccles

One resident remembered a school trip to the nearby settlement of Eccles, which has largely vanished into the sea, along with its place of worship and burial ground.

“It was possible to see human remains,” she said. “Certain people hold this romantic idea that the deceased will just get washed out to the ocean. That is not the case. Individuals will take bones as mementos and go plundering graves looking for valuables. It’s completely disrespectful.”

“I’m worried that the identical fate that happened at Eccles will occur here and there’ll be skeletons on the shore. I would feel disgusted by that.”

A Soldier's Grave in Peril

Along the shoreline lies the grave of a former paratrooper killed while serving abroad. His parent expressed she could not sleep after discovering her child's grave might one day be relocated.

“It does disturb me to consider this won’t be his lasting home,” she said. “For us it’s an significant place to go.”

In her view, new burials should stop but says it is too soon to disturb existing graves. “What I would choose for now is to take no action and closely monitor, but an early decision needs to be made when a critical moment has been attained.”

Seeking Answers and Clarity

An absence of consensus over the timing and method to tackle the problem has resulted in bereaved families feeling frustrated and anxious.

Several families are calling for additional sea defences to delay the inevitable erosion and to allow burials to continue for now. Others argue the time for moving graves is approaching.

“The situation is very emotional,” a family member stated. “The official study was thorough, but now there’s confusion about how it is implemented. And everybody is avoiding responsibility over who is accountable.”

A coastal manager confirmed the graveyards were owned and managed of the local diocese. “Ultimately it is up to them to choose the path to take. Our role is here to assist them through that journey with residents.”

It was also stated there was time to weigh all the choices. “We are talking many years before it begins getting lost.”

“Currently, there exists no common view on what should be done yet. We need productive community discussions to discover the appropriate answers for each community.”

The prospect of the loss of the churches and graveyards was described as one of “profound sadness for the area,” but church representatives also referenced a belief in resurrection, offering a theological perspective on the physical disappearance of hallowed earth.